It might be tempting to add a table matching hardness values to applications. However, that guidance would be wrong often enough to cause real problems, so we have chosen not to include one.
That is because hardness never acts alone. Wall thickness affects a mould's behaviour just as much as hardness does. In practice, a thick, soft mould can be stiffer than a thin, hard one.
Tear strength matters at least as much, and it does not track hardness neatly. So, two moulds with the same hardness but made from different grades can have very different working lives.
Cavity geometry changes things again. A soft mould with a deep, narrow feature will grip harder than a firm mould with an open one.
There is also the human factor, which no chart can capture. The same mould can have two very different lifespans: one in the hands of a maker who owns the piece, and another with a production operator at the end of a long shift. Specifying the mould for the first situation but delivering it for the second is one of the most common reasons moulds fail early.
When a previous supplier's hardness value worked for them, it's natural to ask for the same one. We first ask what your mould needs to do rather than simply matching the number. Often, the original number was right. Sometimes it was inherited from a completely different job, and repeating it only repeats the problem.
If your mould fails at the same corner every time, hardness is one of the things we will look at, alongside the geometry and how the mould is being used. See design for manufacture for the rest of that conversation.